We will notify candidates of their decision via email and will follow-up with a hard copy letter via mail.ĭeposit Received – The admitted student has submitted their seat deposit and confirmation materials.ĭeclined Admission Offer – The applicant was offered admission but either decided not to attend or failed to provide their confirmation materials by the proper deadline. It typically takes the Admissions Committee six-to-eight weeks to issue a decision after the application is complete.ĭecision Made – The Admissions Committee has completed its review of the application and has issued a decision. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed.Īpplication Complete – The application is complete and ready for review. The checklist can be used to determine what items are needed to complete the application. Applicants may contact the Admissions Office at (574) 631-6626 with any questions.Ī student’s application will proceed through various stages between the time of submission and when the Admissions Committee issues a decision.Īpplication Incomplete – The application has been received but is not complete. The Admissions Committee has developed the following glossary to assist applicants in understanding the status terms and processes. The Admissions Office provides students with access to this status checker via email after receipt of their application. 4, pp.351-362, ACM.Applicants to Notre Dame Law School receive access to an online status checker so that they may remain informed of their application’s review state. (2008) 'P4P: provider portal for applications', ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol.
(2013) 'An efficient resource management scheme based on locality for P2P overlay network', Information Technology Convergence, Springer, Netherlands, pp.1047-1053. (2012) Research on Routing Mechanisms of Publish/Subscribe Systems in Peer-to-Peer Networks, pp.7-8, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (in Chinese).
(2011) 'On the efficiency of collaborative caching in ISP-aware P2P networks', INFOCOM, 2011 Proceedings IEEE, IEEE, pp.1224-1232. The experiments prove that the P4P framework based on the distributed tracker can solve the server bottleneck problem and improve the scalability and stability while maintaining the characteristics of locality and transmission capacity. The functions of iTracker arranged by ISP are extended and the info interfaces of the iTracker are designed in detail in order to realise sharing the resources among the different iTrackers. In the improved P4P system, a distributed tracker overlay network replaces the appTracker to manage the resources in the different ISP domains. An improved design of P4P based on distributed tracker is proposed to solve the overload problem of single appTracker server. In this architecture, there is too much workload for the single appTracker, thus, the bottleneck problem often appears when the scale of the network is enlarged in this centralised structure. Every peer registers with appTracker when joining the network, and then requests resources from appTracker. The single appTracker manages sharing resources in the different ISP domains. The P4P architecture is mainly composed of appTracker, iTracker and peer.
0 kommentar(er)
